When the fairer sex gets an unfair advantage.

6a00d834515c5f69e201a3fce8e477970b-800wi

A confession: I had a brief stint on Tinder. This isn’t to say that anyone should be ashamed for using the popular dating app, but as someone who’d never dabbled in online dating, I was certainly apprehensive about joining and didn’t want the world to know. I’ll also admit that I didn’t go to much effort to come across as a typical gent, preferring to start conversations with laughably daft lines like “Do you like sunsets?”.

While I may have successfully weirded out a few women who failed to see the humour (if any) in my lines, at least I can rest assured that I didn’t freak them out with dick pics or a one-word messages reading “Top?”. Just because a woman isn’t close enough to slap me in the face, doesn’t mean she deserves to be demeaned. Unfortunately, that’s what a few new women-centric dating apps are inadvertently doing to men.

Wyldfire positions itself as an app that makes online dating safer for women, and obviously, that’s a very good thing. Considering that, in Australia, 46 percent of violent acts against women are perpetrated by their male partners, current or past, there is a serious problem to be addressed. The way Wyldfire aims to achieve this is by making the app readily available to women, but only open to men who are ‘approved’ by other women. But when the app’s website is sporting the slogan “Ditch the creeps” and is only imposing bans on men, it’s not hard to read between the lines and guess who the creeps are.

The suggestion that all men are creeps has potential to negatively impact the women using the app. We as a society spend a lot of time telling girls and women not to have sex and to be suspicious of men (and then criticize them for being victims of sexual assault). We don’t, however, spend a lot of time telling women they can exercise their discretion in deciding to interact with men and are free to sleep with whoever they want, provided it’s consensual. Wyldfire’s slogan seems to push the idea that all men are predators.

It’s possible that I’m being overly-sensitive to the “creeps” remark. The intention isn’t to take a stab at men, but rather, its competitor Tinder, which has a reputation for fostering inappropriate pictures and objectifying messages. At a loss for hard stats, I’d be willing to bet that most of these inappropriate pictures and objectifying messages are sent to women by men, so I’m not saying men are without fault. Tinder might be viewed as a ‘hook-up app’ but it doesn’t excuse mens rude behaviour. Wyldfire has every reason to impose restrictions on men. Recent history, however, suggests this may not be such a great idea.

In early 2013, a similar dating app called Lulu hit the app store, built on the premise of women rating men on how date-worthy they are. It was described as “The first ever girl-talk app”, but unfortunately, lived up to this reputation in all the wrong ways, with men being branded with degrading hashtags – #NoGoals, #LoserFriends, #MomOnSpeedDial and #CheaperThanABigMac, just to name a few. If this isn’t cyber-bullying, then I don’t know what is.

These are just two apps, with more popping up, such as Siren. But considering the popularity of Lulu in the US and UK (Australia has yet to see a release), there is clearly interest in women-centric dating apps, and women have good reasons for being interested. The general idea isn’t wrong, nor sexist, but the execution is flawed.

I certainly don’t know the best way to fix the imbalances in these apps, and I absolutely do not believe the solution is to create a men-centric equivalent app (I shudder at the thought of what awful things men would spout from their fingertips). And really, the impetus shouldn’t be on women to fix the problem – if men are the ones abusing women, then men are the ones who need to change their actions.

Rude, sexist and violent behaviour of men towards women shouldn’t be tolerated and desperately needs to be addressed, but a guilty-until-proven-innocent approach isn’t the solution.

VINCENT VARNEY is a Sydney-based writer and not a creep. In fact, you can turn the tables and stalk him on Twitter.

Follow BULLSH!T on Facebook and Twitter.

Advertisements

7 thoughts on “When the fairer sex gets an unfair advantage.

  1. Pingback: When the fairer sex gets an unfair advantage. | TinderNews

  2. The problem might just be a simple case of branding. Then again we won’t know till it’s up and running and we see how women are using (or abusing) the power. Leaning on the “ditch the creeps” concept is not really sending the right message but the app at least SEEMS like it’s trying to provide an avenue for guys to get a break by getting a thumbs up for just being there and not getting lost among hordes of douchebags. Looking at it as a simple “fix-up” app might be better than the “THESE men aren’t dicks” angle.

    • Well said. The developers behind these apps don’t mean any ill will to men; they’re trying to deal with offensive behaviour by men on dating apps, and I hope they can succeed. You’re right that we do need to wait for Wyldfire to launch before we know what kind of behaviour it attracts. The attitudes in Lulu, however, don’t give me much faith.

      Thanks for reading!

      • And as I’ve said in the article, I too think the way many men treat women on online dating sites/apps is unacceptable, but is the solution to implement another form of abuse? Two wrongs don’t make a right. We should be focused on ridding the abuse that men inflict on women, which I know is easier said than done because the problem goes back millennia.

        I’m not saying I have a solution (wish I did!). All I’m saying is that I don’t believe this is the best solution to the problem.

        Also, despite the fact that we probably won’t agree on the matter, thanks for reading.

What are your thoughts?

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s